Atheists, there is a god up there in heaven and he loves you so much that he sent his son to die the worst death imaginable and then to turn into a zombie all to save you from sin. Why do you reject him?

Oh, and here’s a real suspicious move on his part—if he’s all about love, then how do you explain all the awful things happening in the world? Tsunamis, starvation, abuse, the Dark Ages, Nickelback, wars, hate, ignorance, floods, earthquakes... and I repeat: NICKELBACK! Just to name a few.

You might think this sky wizard has your back through it all, but statistics and evidence seem to say otherwise. Hell, at this point, my cat on acid could probably make a more coherent argument than that!

And zombies? Seriously, the idea of a "zombie savior" might be fun for a Halloween story, but it's not really convincing evidence of anything other than a cool (if a bit disturbing) narrative. So, no, I’m not rejecting love or compassion—I’m just not buying into the cosmic horror story of divine debt collection and resurrection. I’ll take my love and moral compass from science, reason, and empathy, thank you very much. No undead required.

Romania in the past was a poor country, but last year the government announced it had 521 billion leu (113$ billion dollars) revenue. Why is so much? What's the reason?

Ah, yes, the classic "God loves you so much, He had to send His son to die and come back to life like a cosmic superhero" narrative. First off, thanks for the love, I guess, but here's the thing: sending someone to suffer and die as some kind of cosmic debt collector sounds more like a horror movie plot than an act of love. I mean, how is that even considered love? It's more like "tough love" gone way off the rails.

Psychologically speaking, it feels a bit like an emotional manipulation tactic. "I love you so much, but if you don't accept this blood-soaked redemption story, then you're doomed forever." Yikes. That’s some high-stakes pressure. If love means threatening eternal punishment for not buying into a certain story, then maybe we need to reconsider what "love" actually means.

As for rejecting it, it’s not about rejecting love or goodness—it’s about rejecting a specific mythology that doesn’t align with my understanding of the world. I don’t need a supernatural rescue operation to be a good person or to understand that suffering in the world exists without needing a magical explanation. Life is complicated, people screw up, but I think we can work toward betterment and understanding without needing someone to die for our mistakes.

Why do liberals have a problem with masculine men like Andrew Tate?

If you had the power to save someone from suffering, wouldn’t the loving thing to do be to just prevent the suffering in the first place? If God can snap his fingers and create universes, why wouldn't He just save everyone, no strings attached, without all the bloodshed and drama? It's like going out of your way to punish someone and then telling them, "Hey, I love you, but first, let me put you through hell before you get the free pass." Not exactly the most efficient way to show affection, right?